Australia politically exposed persons (PEPs) alignment with AUSTRAC’s AML/CTF Reforms
Last updated: June 24, 2026
Effective 31 March 2026, the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) introduced a materially expanded definition of Politically Exposed Person (PEP) as part of the country's broader AML/CTF reform programme. The updated framework — amending the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 — broadens the categories of public functions that trigger PEP status.
In line with the latest regulatory guidance issued under AUSTRAC’s AML/CTF reforms, ComplyAdvantage is implementing key enhancements to our Australia dataset to ensure continued alignment with regulatory requirements, as outlined below:
Expanding coverage for Commonwealth entities under the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 (PGPA Act): The reform introduces a requirement to consider the accountable authority of a Commonwealth entity, as well as any member of that accountable authority, as defined under the PGPA Act, for PEP screening purposes. Accordingly, we will include these positions within our database.
Refined scope for local government authorities: In alignment with the guidance, we are expanding our coverage of local government authorities. The guidance clarifies that the relevant function applies only to the Head of a local government council in a state or territory, irrespective of the population size. Accordingly, we will include these positions within our database.
Refined scope for political parties: In alignment with the guidance, we are extending our coverage of political party governing bodies. We will now also include members of governing bodies for state/territory political parties that do have representation in a legislative body.
All other public functions designated as PEP-relevant under AML/CTF reform programme, which are not targeted for the enhancements announced above, are already covered and ready for screening in our database.